Heads up - be safe & avoid paying a fine
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:46 pm
Tripleshot Cycling
Predawn Cafe Destination Cycling
https://forum.tripleshotcycling.ca/
Heads up - be safe & avoid paying a fine
Page 1 of 1
Re: Heads up - be safe & avoid paying a fine
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 6:38 pm
not wearing a helmet is just dumb, it's kindda like a seatbelt, optional, but shouldn't be.
Re: Heads up - be safe & avoid paying a fine
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:24 am
Interesting article in, I think either Velo or Bicycling where they say that not wearing a helmet may have consequences even when it's legal to ride without. Any accident involving a head injury may have the jury finding the cyclist negligent as they may find it 'common sense' to wear a helmet for such an activity that poses a risk of head injury.
The motorcycle helmet law has been challenged. This challenge should be no different with no different outcome. Wear a helmet, if not to law-abide, but for your own health.
The motorcycle helmet law has been challenged. This challenge should be no different with no different outcome. Wear a helmet, if not to law-abide, but for your own health.
Re: Heads up - be safe & avoid paying a fine
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:46 am
http://www.timescolonist.com/Bike+helme ... story.html 
The more I think about this, the more I am not sure whether to laugh or cry.
Here's the best response so far; short and to the point.
http://www.timescolonist.com/health/cov ... story.html
Ron van der Eerden says he's "trying to make things better for everyone." The fact that his legal argument fails out of the gate is beside the point. The fact that the Vancouver Cycling Coalition supports his challenge is where I have an issue. To me, the helmet law is identical to seat belt law. I can't recall the last time anyone argued that constituted a Charter infringement.
I thought the rationale behind these laws was about shared responsibility -- the law protects us both from your own stupidity. It amazes me how myopic individualists cry about 'threats' to collective freedom and yet seemingly have no problem implicitly expecting family and society to bear the costs of their self-interest. Yes, Ron, it may be your inherent right to make stupid choices but, when your head meets the road unprotected, the rest of us ultimately pay a share of your long-term support for the statistically probable aftermath.
R
The more I think about this, the more I am not sure whether to laugh or cry.
Here's the best response so far; short and to the point.
http://www.timescolonist.com/health/cov ... story.html
Ron van der Eerden says he's "trying to make things better for everyone." The fact that his legal argument fails out of the gate is beside the point. The fact that the Vancouver Cycling Coalition supports his challenge is where I have an issue. To me, the helmet law is identical to seat belt law. I can't recall the last time anyone argued that constituted a Charter infringement.
I thought the rationale behind these laws was about shared responsibility -- the law protects us both from your own stupidity. It amazes me how myopic individualists cry about 'threats' to collective freedom and yet seemingly have no problem implicitly expecting family and society to bear the costs of their self-interest. Yes, Ron, it may be your inherent right to make stupid choices but, when your head meets the road unprotected, the rest of us ultimately pay a share of your long-term support for the statistically probable aftermath.
R