I agree with all that has been said here, that:
- saddles are very individual
- Specialized makes great saddles
- you should try demos
- Toupé is an unfortunate name for a great saddle (although I believe that it's spelled "toupet")
In the last 5 years I have ridden 8 different saddles:
San Marco Rolls (from 1990) and ASPide=numbness in the family-generating area
Fizik tri gel and arione=numbness
Specialized toupé, phenom (non-gel)=numbness
Specialized tritip=great for track and road
ISM Adamo racing gel=great for time trials
However, the main consideration is: how rotated forward is your pelvis? The toupé or phenom are good if your back is relaxed (as opposed to flat), but for my riding style, it's imperative to have a gel saddle with a wide nose like the tritip gel. At the end of long time trials (like the TS 66km TTT on NRR), I found that I was numb with the tritip gel. The ISM Adamo has been very good that way. Not that I need to reproduce or anything.
Otherwise, for me anyway, nothing fizik makes works for me, though they look good. This year I demo'd the 2 fiziks, and the arione is a nice climbing saddle, but I wouldn't touch it for anything like TTs, track or general on-the-rivet riding. This is particular me.
Another thing to consider: the problem with demos is that my adaptability to saddles is a long process, and most frequently is in the negative direction. The phenom was great for me in 2008 -- no complaints whatsoever; and then in 2009 I had numbness and prostatitis. The latter is not caused by a given saddle (at least, there's no conclusive research on the connection between them), but the area was so sensitive that I couldn't ride the saddle, even after I got better, hence the change to the tritip. I had previously switched to the phenom after the San Marcos were failing.
If anyone wants to try and/or buy the following (for low prices), email me at
emilederosnay@gmail.com:
ASPide and Rolls (both are worn, but in good shape), phenom (light scratches) and toupé (good shape).
Cheers,
Emile