Re: Pro News
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:57 pm
I used to think it was conspiracy theory stuff too, fueled by some illogical dislike of the guy. Unfortunately (and sadly), the more you dig into the sorted pro cycling world, and get past the Lance Armstrong PR machine "facts" about the guy ("did a lot of good for the sport" is actually one of his top 4 media talking points right now) the more you realize that the truth is more likely a lot closer to all the negative stuff you hear.
Pro cycling is messed up. Lance is one of the top 5 most powerful people in the sport, and he had an ongoing personal and business relationship with the president of the UCI, at the same time the UCI was tasked with monitoring cheating in the sport. There are SO many insider stories and allegations about his conduct, bribery, systemic doping, it is hard to ignore. There has been an ongoing federal investigation into Lance Armstrong at USPS for almost a year now, which would be unlikely to still be ongoing if they had not found any evidence.
I'm with Lister, I'd rather not relegate my favorite sport to being "no different than other pro sports" as far as doping and corruption goes. That's why that cyclingbc letter pissed me off. I'd rather see cycling as a leader in becoming something I'd be happy to encourage my kids to pursue to the highest level. I admit I could personally do much more to try to change it, but I don't think that should stop me from having an opinion about it.
Pro cycling is messed up. Lance is one of the top 5 most powerful people in the sport, and he had an ongoing personal and business relationship with the president of the UCI, at the same time the UCI was tasked with monitoring cheating in the sport. There are SO many insider stories and allegations about his conduct, bribery, systemic doping, it is hard to ignore. There has been an ongoing federal investigation into Lance Armstrong at USPS for almost a year now, which would be unlikely to still be ongoing if they had not found any evidence.
I'm with Lister, I'd rather not relegate my favorite sport to being "no different than other pro sports" as far as doping and corruption goes. That's why that cyclingbc letter pissed me off. I'd rather see cycling as a leader in becoming something I'd be happy to encourage my kids to pursue to the highest level. I admit I could personally do much more to try to change it, but I don't think that should stop me from having an opinion about it.